Is this film complete fact? No, but neither is it complete fiction. There are a lot of holes on the Japanese side of the event. There are few survivors of the battle and the battle is not taught in Japanese schools. There are a number of letters from General Tadamichi Kuribayashi that were found, although the final fate of the leader is unknown. Despite that, the film paints a compelling picture of what it may have been like for those who were there with an intriguing screenplay from Iris Yamashita.
The politics of the war are stripped away and the focus is placed squarely on those on the island. It shows the philosophical differences, the importance 0f honor, and how not everyone shared the view of the imperialist state and just wished to do their job and return home. A good portion of the fighting force was conscripted and sent off to fight, and most likely die. In fact, they were pretty much told to expect to die, either by the hand of the enemy, or by their own. I cannot imagine what it would be like to be on the receiving end of those orders.
Eastwood, along with cinematographer John Stern, shot the film in a severely muted palette, giving the film a near black and white appearance, save for the striking explosions and scenes of the ocean with the Marines landing on the beach. It puts you right in the line of fire, entrenched with the Japanese soldiers seeking to defend the small, desolate island.
Bottomline. This is an amazing film. It is bold in concept, brave in execution, and completely satisfying. I was not sure what I expected to get from the movie, but I left the theater knowing I had seen something great. From the performances, to the music, the time spent with the men, this is a movie to see. This is Eastwood at the top of his game, and the superior half of his Iwo Jima project.
Highly Recommended.
0 comments:
Post a Comment